Sunday, October 11, 2009

A call to action















Barak Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday in a stunning decision that honored the first-year U.S. president more for promise than achievement and drew both praise and skepticism around the world.

The bestowal of one of the world's top accolades on Obama, who has yet to score a major foreign policy success after nearly nine months in office, was greeted with gasps from the audience at the announcement ceremony in Oslo.

Describing himself as surprised and deeply humbled, Obama said he would accept the award as a "call to action" to confront the global challenges of the 21st century.

"I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments but rather an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations," he said in the White House Rose Garden.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised Obama for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," citing his fledgling push for nuclear disarmament and his outreach to the Muslim world.

Obama, a Democrat who took office as the first black U.S. president in January, has been widely credited with improving America's global image after the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush, who alienated both friends and foes with go-it-alone policies like the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

But critics called the Nobel committee's decision premature, given that Obama has achieved few tangible gains as he grapples with challenges ranging from the war in Afghanistan and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to nuclear standoffs with Iran and North Korea.

Obama, told of the prize in a pre-dawn call from his press secretary, now also has the burden of living up to its expectations.

The president, who will travel to Oslo to receive the award on December 10, plans to donate the prize money of 10 million Swedish crowns -- roughly $1.4 million -- to charity, the White House said.

LITANY OF UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS

Obama, 48, has struggled with a litany of foreign policy problems bequeathed to him by Bush, while taking a more multilateral approach than his predecessor.

Obama acknowledged that while winning a prize dedicated to peace, he was commander-in-chief of a country in two wars. "We have to confront the world as we know it," he said.

He won the award on the same day he was convening his war counsel to weigh whether to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan to turn the tide against a resurgent Taliban.

His troubles at home include a battered economy and a fierce debate over healthcare reform that have chipped away at his once-lofty approval ratings and a Republican opposition that has moved well past the honeymoon phase.

"One thing is certain -- President Obama won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action." Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. But Obama is still widely seen around the world as an inspirational figure.

"Very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the Nobel committee said in its citation. But Obama is still widely seen around the world as an inspirational figure. But Obama is still widely seen around the world as an inspirational figure.
"Very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future," the Nobel committee said in its citation.

by Matt Spetalnick,Wojciech Moskwa from Reuters


6 comments:

  1. Obama is effectively a better US president than his predecessor, 'cause Bush left lots of problems unresolved, like the Iraq war, the problems about the nations, the scientific research, etc... and Obama resolved 'em all, or almost. Anyway, we used to think Bush was a good US president since his re-election to the White House, while Obama never stopped to step up. We saw him and his family eating at a McDonald, his wife dressing a designer dress, them all together with Sarcozy and Mrs. Bruni, and more events in which Obama&family appear as normal as the average American. But Obama started to say 'We could do this there...', 'We should help them here...', and 'We are gonna do this in there...', ev'rything about peace projects; 'that's good', we could say. As a matter on fact they're phrases better than Bush's ones: 'USA is getting control in Iraq', 'We need more privates and troops in Middle East', bla bla bla... Bush wanted the war, Obama wants the peace, or a better political situation for ev'rybody.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i think that Obama has been doing many good things for his first year, but recently he hasn't behaved very well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I THINK THAT BARACK OBAMA IS A GOOD POLITICIAN AND A GREAT MAN.
    CERTAINLY THIS ISN'T THE BEST MOMENT TO GOVERN U.S.A. BUT I THINK THAT HE'S DOING A GREAT JOB.
    I THINK THAT THE NOBEL PRICE WAS GIVEN TO HIM AS ENCOURAGEMENT TO CONTINUE TO WORK HARDLY AS HE'S DOING

    ReplyDelete
  4. dude, u don't need to use caps lock, uh? :)
    anyway, i don't think he can say just "China is growing, good thing", maybe he should keep an eye on that situation...

    ReplyDelete
  5. not much agree on the Nobel obama ... lu as many persoe have done so much for the americaperò nesuna of them has received. I think it was soon to give a prize to Obama so important

    ReplyDelete
  6. i think that Obama is a good president but there isn't the best moment to take the nobel peace...the nobel gave to obama especially for his promise because he is in the president of the u.s.a. for only 9 months.
    of course Obama is more pacifist than Bush and we can see his family like a normal american family but the nobel is premature.
    Obama managed to give us a picture of a better world and he's trying to resolve the problems of his predecessor

    ReplyDelete